Next: Global sections Up: Topos Previous: Example of Yoneda's Lemma
Definition 1.14
A Subobject Classifier
is a presheaf
such that to each object
there corresponds an object
which represents the set
of all sieves 1.9.1
on A, and to each
-arrow
there corresponds an
-arrow
such that
is a sieve on B, where
We now want to show that this definition of subobject classifier is in agreement with definition 1.12.
In order to do that we need to define the analog of arrow
true (T) and the characteristic function (see section 1.8.1) in Topos.
Definition 1.15
is the natural transformation 3.5 that has components
given by
= principal sieve on A
To understand how T works, let us consider a monic arrow
therefore
What equation 1.2 means is that we require F(f) to be the restriction of X(f) to F(A). This condition is expressed by the following diagram
i.e. f belongs to
iff X(f) maps x into F(B).
, as defined by equation 1.2,
represents a sieve on A.
Proof.
Consider the following commuting diagram which represents subobject F of the presheaf X.
If
belongs to
then given
it follows that f o g belongs to
since from the above diagram it can be deduced that
.
This is precisely the definition of a sieve 1.9.1 so we have proved that
is a sieve.
As a consequence of axiom 1.1 the condition of being a subobject classifier can be
restated in the following way.
Definition 1.16
is a
subobject classifier iff there is a ``one to one" correspondence between subobject of X and morphisms
from X to
.
Given this alternative definition of a subobject classifier, it is easy to prove that Moreover for each morphism
Next: Global sections Up: Topos Previous: Example of Yoneda's Lemma Cecilia Flori 2007-03-17